Comparison of HIV/AIDS Rates Between U.S.-Born Blacks and African-Born Blacks in Utah, 2000 – 2009

Crystal Ashton1, Scott A Bernhardt*, 2, Mike Lowe3, Matthew Mietchen4, Jim Johnston1
1 Department of Health Promotion and Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
2 Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
3 Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
4 Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 3788
Abstract HTML Views: 1907
PDF Downloads: 600
Total Views/Downloads: 6295
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1804
Abstract HTML Views: 951
PDF Downloads: 429
Total Views/Downloads: 3184

Creative Commons License
© Ashton et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA; Tel: (435) 797-3721; E-mail:


The Utah Department of Health currently groups African-born blacks with U.S.-born blacks when reporting HIV/AIDS surveillance data. Studies suggest that categorizing HIV/AIDS cases in this manner may mask important epidemiological trends, and the distinct differences between these two populations warrant disaggregating data prior to reporting. The purpose of this study was to characterize the HIV/AIDS positive populations in U.S. and African-born blacks in Utah and evaluate the need for disaggregating the two groups. A total of 1,111 cases were identified through the statewide electronic HIV/AIDS Reporting System from 2000 - 2009. Data were analyzed for prevalence of HIV diagnosis for African-born blacks, U.S.-born blacks, and U.S.-born whites. Secondary analysis included HIV diagnosis by age, sex, African region of nativity, transmission risk factors, and differences in late diagnosis of HIV infection. U.S.-born whites accounted for 914 (82.3%) cases, and had the lowest annual prevalence (4/100,000). Conversely, African-born and U.S.- born blacks had the highest prevalence, 162/100,000 and 24/100,000 respectively. African-born blacks made up 0.25% of the total population, but accounted for 7.9% of all HIV/AIDS cases. African-born black males were more likely to report “no reported risk” for HIV transmission than U.S.-born black males. Of African-born blacks, 55.7% reported East-African nativity. These results demonstrate the importance of stratifying the black/African American racial category by African-born and U.S.-born blacks when collecting and reporting HIV/AIDS state surveillance data even in a low-incidence state,which will better inform prevention and linkage-to-care efforts in Utah.

Keywords:: HIV, AIDS, surveillance, Utah, epidemiology, African-born..