Forms of Stigma and Discrimination in the Daily Lives of HIV-Positive Individuals in Mauritania

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Forms of Stigma and Discrimination in the Daily Lives of HIV-Positive Individuals in Mauritania

The Open AIDS Journal 31 Mar 2017 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/1874613601711010012

Abstract

Summary:

People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) are often discriminated against in their daily lives. The objective of this descriptive and transversal study was to describe the experiences of PLWHA followed at a specialized outpatient center in Nouakchott to assess the forms of stigma from the perspective of those who suffer from discrimination.

Methods:

All HIV-positive patients over the age of 18 years who were aware of their HIV status and provided consent to participate in the study were included from June 1 to 29, 2015. Data collection was conducted using a pre-tested questionnaire.

Results:

A total of 210 PLWHA were interviewed. Men accounted for 54% of the sample population with a sex ratio of 1.2. About half of respondents were married (51%) and resided in Nouakchott (55%). Subjects who had never attended school represented 42% of the cases. Among our respondents, 64% knew their HIV status for over a year and admitted that they refused to reveal this information to any person. The distribution of forms of stigma experienced by PLWHA by demographic category was, in descending order, stigma in interpersonal relationships (78%), self-stigma (20%), and stigma in health services (2%). There was a significant association between the form of stigma and marital status (p = 0.007) and between the form of stigma and knowledge of HIV status for a period greater than one year (p = 0.02).

Conclusion:

The forms of stigma can be sources of discrimination and are a major obstacle to reintegration and support of PLWHA. This creates a vicious circle that, on the one hand, leads to the suffering, marginalization, and isolation of PLWHA, and on the other hand, has deleterious effects on their family and social relationships, self-esteem and self-confidence.

Keywords: Stigma, Discrimination, AIDS, Mauritania, PLWHA, UNAIDS.

INTRODUCTION

HIV/AIDS has become epidemic since the first cases were identified in the 1980s [1]. According to the 2014 UNAIDS report, 35 million people were living with HIV worldwide by the end of 2013, and the highest numbers of people living with HIV were in sub-Saharan Africa, with about 24.7 million people living with HIV/AIDS [2]. In Mauritania, the epidemiological situation of HIV infection is not well known. Nevertheless, existing data suggest an estimated seroprevalence rate of less than 1% in the general population [3]. Based on this prevalence rate, Mauritania can be considered as the least affected country in West Africa. PLWHA may be confronted with the belief that they have profoundly changed their lifestyles, and the comments received from them reflect a very serious concern about the deterioration of social ties. They are based on a representation of AIDS that produces an image of the PLWHA in Africa who are necessarily rejected and excluded by the entourage [4].

The sociological aspects of HIV/AIDS have not been studied on a large scale in Mauritania. The objective of the present study was to describe the experiences of PLWHA followed at a specialized outpatient treatment center in Nouakchott in order to evaluate the forms of stigma from the point of view of those who suffer from it.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The single-pass, descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out at the outpatient HIV-treatment center in Nouakchott during the period from June 1 to 29, 2015. This specialized care unit was designed to provide specific care and needs of patients infected with HIV. This care center was created with the support of the French Red Cross and is the only specific medical care structure in the country that offers PLWHA a range of complete care, including antiretroviral treatment. The study population consisted of HIV-positive patients aged more than 18 years old who were aware of their HIV status and provided a written informed consent to participate in the study. Data collection was performed using a previously tested questionnaire. The questions focused on socio-demographic attributes, clinical data, and data on the personal views of the PLWHA on his or her relationships with other family members. The diagnosis of HIV infection was established using the rapid diagnostic test DetermineTM HIV-1/2 (Alere Medical Co. Lt, Japan). Data were entered and analyzed using version 6.4 EPI INFO software. For the comparison of qualitative variables, the chi-square test was used. The P value of ≤ 0.05 was chosen as the threshold of significance.

RESULTS

During our four-week study period, 210 PLWHA were interviewed. These patients were composed of 113 men (54%) and 97 women (46%), with a sex ratio (men:women) of 1.2. About half of the respondents were married (51%) and resided in Nouakchott (55%) at the time of inclusion. Among married patients, his or her partner was also HIV-positive in all cases, and they were living together at the time of inclusion. Subjects who had never attended school accounted for 42% of the cases. Among our interviewees, 64% knew their HIV status for more than a year and refused to reveal this information to any close friend or family members. The distribution of forms of stigma and discrimination perceived and experienced by PLWHA by socio-demographic category, in descending order, was as follows: stigma in interpersonal relationships (78%), self-stigma (20%), and stigma in health services (2%) (Table 1). Despite the fact that 64% of patients refused to reveal their HIV status, the information was somehow revealed to a member of the entourage in additional 14% of the patients despite medical confidentiality. The relationships between the forms of stigma and socio-demographic categories are summarized in Table 2.

Table 1.
Distribution of people living with HIV/AIDS by socio-demographic characteristics.
Socio-demographic Characteristics Number Percentage
Gender
 Male 113 54%
 Female 97 46%
Marital status  
 Married 107 51%
 Divorced 55 26%
 Single 39 19%
 Widowed 9 4%
Age  
 ≥ 30 years old 178 85%
 18 to < 30 years old 32 15%
Origin  
 Nouakchott 116 55%
 Other cities 94 45%
Education  
 None 88 42%
 Primary education 63 30%
 Secondary education or higher 59 28%
Knowledge of privacy status and sharing  
 Yes 134 64%
 No 76 36%
Forms of stigma  
 Interpersonal relationships 164 78%
 Self-stigmatization 42 20%
 Health care 4 2%
Table 2.
Distribution of socio-demographic characteristics of people living with HIV/AIDS and forms of stigma.
Socio-demographic Characteristics N Self-stigmatization Interpersonal Relationships Health Care P
Sexe  
 Male 113 18 93 2 0.2 
 Female 97 24 71 2  
Marital status  
 Married 107 34 71 2 0.07
 Divorced 55 4 50 1  
 Single 39 1 37 1  
 Widowed 9 3 6  
Age  
 ≥ 30 years older 178 36 140 2 0.1
 18 to < 30 years old 32 6 24 2  
Origin  
 Nouakchott 116 24 90 2 0.9
 Other cities 94 18 74 2  
Education  
 none 88 15 70 3  
 Primary education 63 15 48  
 Secondary education or higher 59 12 46 1  
Knowledge of privacy status and sharing  
 Yes 134 28 106 0.02
 No 76 14 58 4  

DISCUSSION

The HIV/AIDS epidemic has been the subject of several campaigns on information, education, communication and awareness in Mauritania, but stigma and discrimination still largely persist, and they increase the vulnerability of PLWHA [5]. The effects of stigma and discrimination have been addressed in psychiatry, social science, and public health on several occasions [6-10]. It is to the sociologist Erwin Goffman that we owe the first important study on this problem [11]. Subsequent studies have unanimously agreed that stigma has adverse effects on HIV/AIDS management [1, 12-14].

It is especially important to think of stigma as social and cultural phenomenon linked to the actions of whole groups of people in the developing world, where bonds and allegiances to families, village, neighborhood, and community abound [15, 16]. Rather than a static notion of stigma and discrimination, these phenomena should be analyzed and understood through new dynamic conceptual frameworks in different cultural backgrounds [15].

In our study, the sex ratio of male to female was 1.2. These results are likely to reflect the HIV/AIDS epidemic, which affects more men than women. This is mainly due to the steady increase in the proportion of men who have been infected through homosexual practices and poverty. Women living in poverty are less exposed to difficult conditions outside the home. More than half of the interviewees resided in Nouakchott, the capital city of Mauritania. This is due to a massive migration of the Mauritanian population to the capital where there is currently the only outpatient treatment center specifically created for medical care of the PLWHA in Mauritania. Furthermore, we found that the majority of HIV-infected individuals had never attended school or did not go beyond high school. This large percentage of uneducated or poorly educated patients may explain the lack of knowledge about the modes of transmission and HIV prevention and limited access to information on HIV, on the one hand, and vulnerability due to the risks that they unknowingly undertake in their sexual behavior, on the other hand [3, 5, 16]. Many of our interviewees (64%) had known their HIV status for more than a year but refused to reveal this information to intimate friends or family members. This refusal to communicate their medical condition can most probably be explained by the fear of being stigmatized by the society and the loss of esteem of the entourage [17-20]. Indeed, in much of the existing literature on stigma, investigators do not provide its definition at all, or refer to ‘a mark of disgrace’, or some similar aspect, such as stereotyping or social rejection. A consensus on the working definition of stigma and discrimination is required for further work on this problem [15]. Discrimination is a consequence of stigma and defined as “when, in the absence of objective justification, a distinction is made against a person that results in that person being treated unfairly and unjustly on the basis of belonging or being perceived to belong, to a particular group” [16]. In our study, stigma and discrimination in interpersonal relationships were the major form experienced by PLWHA. This form of stigma and discrimination seems to be more predominant in Mauritania than in other West African countries, such as Burkina Faso and Senegal, where studies have reported the prevalence of stigma in interpersonal relationships of 18% and 40%, respectively [18, 21]. The reason behind the importance of stigma and discrimination in interpersonal relationships observed in PLWHA in Mauritania may be due to the conception of the pathology itself by the population as a shameful disease since HIV is mainly transmitted by the sexual route in Africa. Neumann's analysis of stigma conducted in four African countries (Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi, and Uganda) showed that women were more likely to experience stigma in interpersonal relationships than men [22]. In our study, PLWHA who were separated or who had deceased partners were more likely to experience stigma in interpersonal relationships. The separation may have been a consequence of rejection by the partner, or widowhood may have been one of the causes of stigmatization. Our observations are similar to those reported in a study performed in Burkina Faso [18].

Self-stigmatization was less important in Mauritania, compared to other countries included in the MATCH study (Malawi, Ouganda and Kenya) and Burkina Faso [18, 22]. In other African countries, self-sigmatization was the most frequent form of stigma experienced by PLWHA. The detailed analysis of its manifestations showed that more than 20% of our PLWHA had sometimes low self-esteem due to HIV infection, indicating the limits of support for self-esteem among PLWHA [18]. Separated individuals and widows or widowers often lead stigmatized interpersonal relationships with or without HIV/AIDS, and are more likely to isolate themselves when infected and confronted with HIV/AIDS. This could be a consequence of or amplified by the stigma of which they are victims [23, 24].

Stigma in our health services was low. This result reflects a good level of acceptance of PLWHA by health workers. In our study, school-based PLWHA often reported that health care providers had taken more precautions with them than with other patients. These findings are similar to those reported in a study conducted in Burkina Faso [18].

We highlighted statistical differences related to marital status, gender, age, and sharing of confidentiality about the experience of stigma, suggesting that stigma affects all age groups, regardless of gender and the social environment. Nevertheless, as in other studies, the methodology does not make it possible to specify the meaning of this correlation. Associative community support and psychosocial care practices may place more emphasis on solidarity with patients than on the perception that PLWHA have of themselves in a country where there are very few psychologists in health care services.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the difficulties of managing HIV/AIDS in Mauritania as in other African countries. From an applied point of view, these results show that a significant proportion of PLWHA suffer because of their status, despite the absence of stigmatization and discrimination by third parties, suggesting that the development of psychosocial counseling may allow more PLWHA to “live positively” with HIV. This requires financial resources for psychological support activities for HIV-infected persons, identification of innovative strategies for screening and treating people with depressive psychological disorders or high levels of self-stigma, which is a risk factor for clinical depression. Additional qualitative analyses are needed to define the role of associations, including the determination of whether associations' activities are ineffective in stigmatizing, or if participation in an association makes people more sensitive to discriminatory manifestations, which may explain why they are more effective, or if associations are a place of recourse for the people most affected by stigmatization. The strength of this study is its representativeness of PLWHA in Nouakchott because it has taken into account the PLWHA who met in different places of medical and community care but received care at the same clinic.

FUNDING SOURCES

All authors declare that they have no funding sources.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Boushab Mohamed Boushab (bboushab@gmail.com):1st author and Corresponding author, he has been involved in drafting the manuscript, made substantial contributions to study conception and design, clinical data verification, discussion section.

Malick Fall Fatim-Zahra (zahrafallmalick@gmail.com): 2nd author, manuscript correction.

Ould Cheikh Melaïnine Mohamed Limame (limameh@yahoo.fr): 3th author, manuscript correction.

Basco Leonardo Kishi (lkbasco@yahoo.fr): 4th author, manuscript correction.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

1
Beaulieu M, Adrien A, Potvin L, Dassa C. Stigmatizing attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS: Validation of a measurement scale. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 1246.
3
Ba K, Keita M, Fall-Malick FZ, Mint Beibakar M, Diallo M, Lo BB. Enquête comportementale et sérologique sur le VIH/sida chez les détenus à Nouakchott (Mauritanie). Bull Soc Pathol Exot 2015; 108(3): 208-12.
4
Egrot M. Renaître d’une mort sociale annoncée: Recomposition du lien social des personnes vivant avec le VIH en Afrique de l’Ouest (Burkina Faso, Sénégal). Cult Sociétés 2007; (1): 49-56.
5
Abadía-Barrero CE, Castro A. Experiences of stigma and access to HAART in children and adolescents living with HIV/AIDS in Brazil. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62(5): 1219-28.
6
Thornicroft G, Rose D, Kassam A, Sartorius N. Stigma: Ignorance, prejudice or discrimination? Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190(3): 192-3.
7
Lauber C. Stigma and discrimination against people with mental illness: A critical appraisal. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2008; 17(1): 10-3.
8
Stuart H. The stigmatization of mental illnesses. Can J Psychiatry Rev Can Psychiatr 2012; 57(8): 455-6.
9
Gaebel W, Zäske H, Zielasek J, et al. Stigmatization of psychiatrists and general practitioners: Results of an international survey. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2015; 265(3): 189-97.
10
Link BG, Phelan JC. Stigma and its public health implications. Lancet 2006; 367(9509): 528-9.
11
Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc. 1963.
12
Skinner D, Mfecane S. Stigma, discrimination and the implications for people living with HIV/AIDS in South Africa. SAHARA J 2004; 1(3): 157-64.
13
Klopper C, Stellenberg E, van der Merwe A. Stigma and HIV disclosure in the Cape Metropolitan area, South Africa. Afr J AIDS Res 2014; 13(1): 37-43.
14
Judgeo N, Moalusi KP. My secret: The social meaning of HIV/AIDS stigma. SAHARA J 2014; 11(1): 76-83.
15
Parker R, Aggleton P. HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: A conceptual framework and implications for action. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57(1): 13-24.
16
Mahajan AP, Sayles JN, Patel VA, et al. Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: A review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward. AIDS 2008; 22(Suppl 2): S67-79.
17
Boushab MB, Fall-Malick FZ, Diallo A, Ould S. ML. Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques de la population du Hodh El Gharbi (Mauritanie) face au virus de l’immunodéficience humaine (VIH). RMIM 2016; 8: 43-51.
18
Gausset Q, Mogensen HO, Yameogo WM, Berthé A, Konaté B. The ambivalence of stigma and the double-edged sword of HIV/AIDS intervention in Burkina Faso. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74(7): 1037-44.
19
Ky-Zerbo O, Desclaux A, Somé J-F, El Asmar K, Msellati P, Obermeyer CM. HIV/AIDS stigma in Africa: Analysis of its forms and manifestations in Burkina Faso. Sante Publique 2014; 26(3): 375-84.
20
Mittal D, Babitha GA, Prakash S, Kumar N, Prashant GM. Knowledge and attitude about HIV/AIDS among HIV-positive individuals in Davangere. Soc Work Public Health 2015; 30(5): 423-30.
21
Ouedraogo TL, Ouedraogo A, Ouedraogo V, Kyelem N, Soubeiga A. Infection à VIH et modifications des relations sociales: étude auprès de 188 personnes infectées par le VIH à Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Sante 2005; 15(4): 253-7.
22
Desclaux A, Boye S, Taverne B. The social relegation of widows living with HIV in the time of ART in Senegal. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 2014; 107(4): 273-8.
23
Neuman M, Obermeyer CM, Group MS. Experiences of stigma, discrimination, care and support among people living with HIV: A four country study. AIDS Behav 2013; 17(5): 1796-808.
24
Infante C, Zarco A, Cuadra SM, et al. HIV/AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: The case of health care providers in México. Salud Publica Mex 2006; 48(2): 141-50.