HIV Testing among Adolescents and Youth in the United States: Update from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System



Joseph Inungu*, 1, Averetta Lewis1, Mustafa Z Younis2, Jessica Wood1, Sarah O’Brien1, Deidre Verdun3
1 Saginaw Valley State University, Saginaw, MI, USA
2 Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA
3 Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 368
Abstract HTML Views: 310
PDF Downloads: 143
Total Views/Downloads: 821
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 226
Abstract HTML Views: 180
PDF Downloads: 93
Total Views/Downloads: 499



© Inungu et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Walden University, College of Health Services, 155 Fifth Ave. South, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA; Tel: (989) 401 3416/(989) 493 6274; E-mail: Jin202@gmail.com


Abstract

Objectives:

We examined the prevalence of HIV testing in a representative sample of US adolescents and youth, assessed the location and method of testing used during their last HIV testing, and compare the characteristics of those who had and had not been tested for HIV.

Methods and Principal Findings:

Data on adolescents and youth who participated in the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey were analyzed. Of the 6,628 adolescents and youth who participated in the 2009 BRFSS, 54.4% were male, 59.1% were white, 37.4% graduated from high school, 29.6% live in the western states in the United States. Their mean age was 20.9 years (± 2.07 SD). Of these participants, 31.8% had been tested for HIV. The majority of adolescents had been tested for HIV either at private physician offices (38%) or public clinics (31.7%) compared to HIV counseling and testing sites (3.1%). Only 30.5% of adolescents were tested using a rapid HIV antibody test. Being female, African-American, Asian or multiracial, divorced/widowed, and living in the Western and NorthEastern states in the United States were associated with a high probability of testing for HIV.

Conclusions:

The low prevalence of adolescents who tested for HIV and the low proportion of those offered rapid HIV testing after the 2006 CDC’s new guidelines about HIV testing raise serious concerns about the effectiveness of HIV prevention efforts particularly among adolescents. More innovative strategies are needed to increase the number of adolescents and youth who become aware of their HIV serostatus.

Keywords: Adolescents, HIV testing, location, method of testing and predictors..