# Impact of HIV/AIDS on Social Relationships in Rural China

Yurong Zhang1, Xiulan Zhang1, Tamara Hanko Aleong2, Esme Fuller-Thomson*, 2, 3
1 School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
2 Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, Ontario, Canada
3 Department of Family & Community Medicine University of Toronto, Canada

#### Article Metrics

3
##### Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 202
Abstract HTML Views: 232
##### Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 138
Abstract HTML Views: 111

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor St. W., Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada; Tel: 416 978-3269; Fax: 416 978-7072; E-mail: esme.fuller.thomson@utoronto.ca

## Abstract

Social support promotes greater medical compliance, better immune system functioning and slows the progress of HIV/AIDS. One in every 50 People Living With HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) is Chinese, yet little is known about the impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships in China. This study compares the characteristics of those who report that HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact versus a modest impact on their social relationships. We obtained data from a survey of 866 PLWHA in rural China, which was conducted in 2006-2007 in the three Chinese provinces with the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS. Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression were performed. The analysis shows that PLWHA who had full-blown AIDS (OR= 1.53; 95% CI=1.09-2.13) and those who were poor (OR=2.19; 95% CI=1.52-3.16) reported greater impact on their social relationships. The results lay a solid foundation for designing effective policy initiatives and intervention programs aimed at alleviating the impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships and improving the quality of life of PLWHA.

Keywords: HIV/AIDS, China, social relationships, developing world, social support..

## INTRODUCTION

In the mid-1990s, the epidemic of HIV/AIDS spread to central China, primarily through unsafe practices of blood collection. In the following years, HIV transmission through blood and plasma donations and transfusion became effectively contained by new regulations for blood and plasma collection stations. By 2007, the main mode of transmission had shifted to heterosexual transmission (37.9%) [1]. Approximately 740,000 Chinese are now HIV positive indicating that one in every 50 People Living With HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in the world are Chinese [2, 3].

### Measurement

This study uses one two-part question to investigate the PLWHA’s perception of the “impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships with 1) relatives and/or friends and on neighbors (other than spouse and children) and 2) neighbors.” PLWHA reported the degree to which they perceived that their social relationships were impacted by HIV/AIDS. Their original 5 point likert scale response categories were dichotomized into “limited impact” (including none or a little impact) versus “substantial impact” (including medium, a lot or huge impact).

The following demographic variables were investigated: gender, education level (illiterate, primary school, above primary school), marital status (married, unmarried including widowed, single, or divorced), age (measured by decade: 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60 and over), household income and living conditions.

We used receipt of Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART) as a proxy for disease severity. Individuals who received HAART were classified as having AIDS. HAART is provided by the Chinese government free of charge to all individuals with AIDS. Those who did not receive HAART were classified as having HIV only. Time since diagnosis was classified into three categories: 2 or fewer years, 3-6 years, 7 or more years.

### Statistic Analysis Strategy

This study identified the socio-demographic characteristics of those who reported their HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact on their social relationships versus PLWHA who reported limited impact. Chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with use of SPSS 11.5 software. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the characteristics of PLWHA who reported that HIV/AIDS had limited impact on their social relationships with relatives and/or friends (n=424) in comparison to those who reported substantial impact on these relationships (n=439). A similar set of analyses contrasted those who reported the HIV/AIDS had limited impact on their social relationships with neighbors (n=541) versus those who reported substantial impact (n=322). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted separately to estimate p value, odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (C.I) for PLWHA’s perceived impact of HIV/AIDS on relatives/ friends and on neighbors.

## RESULTS

A total of 866 PLWHAs were interviewed in this study. The majority of participants were female, married, had completed primary school and were 30-49 years of age (see Table 1). Most of participants were diagnosed with HIV three to six years ago (76%) and one-quarter of the respondents had full-blown AIDS.

Table 1.

The Impact of HIV/AIDS on Social Relationships by the Characteristics of Persons Living with HIV/AIDS in Rural China

N (%) With Relatives and/or Friends With Neighbors

Limited (N=424, 49.1%) Subst. (N=439,50.9%) p-Value Limited (N=541,62.7%) Subst. (N=322, 37.3%) p-Value

Gender 0.24 0.86
Male 415 (47.9%) 49.8% 45.8% 47.5% 48.1%
Female 451 (52.1%) 50.2% 54.2% 52.5% 51.9%

Education Level 0.30 0.82
Illiterate 286 (33.1%) 30.7% 35.6% 33.3% 33.0%
Primary school 411 (47.5%) 49.3% 45.7% 46.8% 48.6%
Above primary school 168 (19.4%) 20.0% 18.7% 20.0% 18.4%

Marital status 0.36 0.85
Married 618 (71.4%) 70.0% 72.9% 71.7% 71.1%
Unmarried 248 (28.6%) 30.0% 27.1% 28.3% 28.9%

Age by decade, year 0.01 0.03
20-29 67 (7.7%) 9.4% 5.7% 7.6% 7.5%
30-39 291 (33.6%) 34.7% 32.6% 33.8% 33.2%
40-49 323 (37.3%) 37.5% 37.4% 38.6% 35.4%
50-59 147 (17.0%) 13.2% 20.7% 14.4% 21.4%
≥60 38 (4.4%) 5.2% 3.6% 5.5% 2.5%

Time since diagnosis, year 0.32 0.69
≤2 27 (3.1%) 4.0% 2.3% 3.5% 2.5%
3-6 653 (76.0%) 75.8% 76.2% 75.8% 76.3%
≥7 179 (20.8%) 20.2% 21.5% 20.7% 21.2%

Clinical stage 0.00 0.01
HIV 639 (73.8%) 78.3% 69.2% 76.9% 68.3%
AIDS 227 (26.2%) 21.7% 30.8% 23.1% 31.7%

Income 0.00 0.04
Low 288 (33.3%) 25.9% 40.3% 31.4% 36.3%
Middle 289 (33.4%) 31.8% 35.1% 32.2% 35.7%
High 289 (33.4%) 42.2% 24.6% 36.4% 28.0%

Living conditions comparing
to other families in the village
0.00 0.00
Similar to others 170 (20.1%) 26.8% 13.5% 23.4% 14.5%
A lit lower than others 225 (26.6%) 27.5% 25.7% 27.6% 24.7%
Much lower than others 451 (53.3%) 45.7% 60.8% 49.0% 60.9%

Status of relationship with neighbors NA 0.00
Neighbors do not provide any assistance 95 (11.3%) 7.5% 18.2%
Neighbors may provide
some assistance if there is a crisis
162 (19.3%) 14.0% 28.7%
Some neighbors provide regular assistance 262 (31.2%) 31.2% 31.4%
Most neighbors provide regular assistance 321 (38.2%) 47.4% 21.8%
Table 2.

Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Reporting the Impact of HIV/AIDS on Social Relationships Among PLWHA (n=866)

with Relatives and/or Friends with Neighbors

Variables Odds Ratio 95% CI p Odds Ratio 95% CI p

Gender
Male 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
Female 0.90 0.66-1.24 0.52 0.82 0.59-1.14 0.23

Education Level
Illiterate 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
Primary school 0.89 0.63-1.26 0.51 1.07 0.75-1.53 0.72
Above Primary school 0.93 0.60-1.45 0.75 0.96 0.61-1.50 0.84

Marital status
Unmarried 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
Married 1.27 0.91-1.78 0.16 1.15 0.82-1.63 0.42

20-29 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
30-39 1.37 0.73-2.59 0.32 1.01 0.53-1.91 0.98
40-49 1.50 0.79-2.84 0.21 1.01 0.53-1.92 0.98
50-59 2.37* 1.18-4.77 0.01 1.75 0.87-3.51 0.11
≥60 1.01 0.41-2.48 0.98 0.49 0.18-1.34 0.16

Income (per capita)
High 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
Low 2.19*** 1.52-3.16 0.00 1.27 0.87-1.85 0.20
Middle 1.69** 1.19-2.41 0.004 1.30 0.90-1.87 0.16

Living conditions comparing to other families in the village
Similar to others 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
Much lower than others 2.18*** 1.47-3.24 0.00 1.93** 1.27-2.93 0.002
A lit lower than others 1.76** 1.15-2.70 0.01 1.50 0.95-2.36 0.08

Clinical stage
HIV 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
AIDS 1.53* 1.09-2.13 0.013 1.62** 1.16-2.25 0.005

p≤0.05

** p≤0.01

*** p≤0.001.

Half of respondents (50.9%) perceived that HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact on their social relationships with relatives and/or friends and over one third (37.3%) perceived a substantial impact on social relationships with neighbors (see Table 1). PLWHA who reported HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact on their social relationships with relatives and/or friends and with neighbors were more likely to be aged 50-59, and were poorer than those who perceived that HIV/AIDS had limited impact on their social relationships. The perceived impact of HIV/AIDS on relationships with relatives and/or friends and with neighbors was greater among those who reported that their living conditions were much lower than that of others in their village. Individuals who reported a deterioration in their relationships with neighbors were less likely to report that neighbors currently provided regular assistance. Individuals who were diagnosed with AIDS as opposed to HIV were more likely to report a substantial impact on both relatives and/or friends and neighbors.

As shown in the logistic regression analyses (See Table 2), PLWHA had twice the odds of reporting that HIV/AIDS had an impact on their relationships with relatives and/or friends if they were aged 50-59 in comparison to those aged 20 to 29. Those in the lowest income bracket had twice the odds of those in the highest income category of reporting that HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact on their relationship with relatives and/or friends. In comparison to those who reported their living standard was average in their village, those who reported a much lower standard of living had twice the odds of reporting that HIV/AIDS substantially affected their relationship with relatives and/or friends. Respondents with AIDS had 53% higher odds of reporting that HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact on relationship with relatives and/or friends than respondents who were HIV positive but did not have AIDS.

Similarly, the odds of reporting that HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact on relationships with neighbors were higher among those with AIDS as opposed to HIV, and those who reported their living conditions were much lower than other villagers. In contrast to the bivariate findings, age and income level were not statistically significant factors in the multiple logistic regression analysis focused on relationship with neighbors.

## DISCUSSION

Half of the respondents reported that they perceived that HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact on social relationships with relatives and/or friends. One third of the PLWHA in this study reported the disease had a substantial impact on their social relationships with neighbors. The poorest respondents and those with AIDS as opposed to HIV were the most likely to report social relationships were seriously affected by their illness.

The long-term consequences of such widespread perceived impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships may be considerable. Previous research has demonstrated the importance of strong social support networks for PLWHA [30-36,42]. As was discussed above, social support promotes greater medical compliance, improves immune system functioning and slows the progress of HIV/AIDS [24-29,43]. Neighbors are an integral part of many rural Chinese’s social support network. Among those who reported limited impact of HIV/AIDS on relations with neighbors, almost one-half reported that neighbors regularly provided assistance to them. For those who claimed that HIV/AIDS had substantial impact on relationships with neighbors, only one in five relied on neighbors for regular assistance.

Our findings indicate that those with lower socioeconomic status were more likely to report that HIV/AIDS has had a substantial impact on their social relationships. The respondents’ subjective perspective of their living standard relative to other villagers was strongly associated with the perceived impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships with relatives and/or friends and with neighbors. Income level was associated with the perceived impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships with relatives and/or friends but not with neighbors. Poorer individuals may need to rely more intensely on extended family members, friends and/or neighbors to help with caregiving and/or financial assistance. In contrast, affluent AIDS households can often manage with no or minimal economic assistance or tangible support from relatives. It is possible that the additional demands on family and friends required by impoverished PLWHA may put undue strain on their relationships. If this is so, one potential strategy to mitigate the negative impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships is to take measures to strengthen the economic status of AIDS households. Although the government provides financial assistance to PLWHA, the amount received is only approximately 10% of the average annual household income. Governments or Non-Governmental Organizations could develop programs or create supportive policies including micro-loan services, tax benefits, and support groups to assist PLWHA in finding employment suitable to their health status. Such a strategy could not only increase household income, but could decrease the negative impact of HIV/AIDS and improve quality of life.

PLWHAs were more likely to report that HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact on relationships both with relatives and/or friends and with neighbors if the disease had progressed to the AIDS stage. The caregiving demands on an individual’s social support network and the concomitant potential for strain in these relationships often increase as the illness progresses. Another hypothesis results from the fact that the disease is harder to conceal once it becomes symptomatic. North American literature suggests that those with AIDS symptomatology face greater AIDS stigma [44]. It may be this higher level of stigma that results in declining quality of some social relationships.

Individuals aged 50-59 were more than twice as likely to report an impact on their relationships with relatives and/or friends in comparison to PLWHA in their 20s. If the PLWHA’s perceived impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships is primarily mediated through stigma, this study’s finding is not congruent with previous research. A meta-analysis based on 24 peer reviewed journal articles published since 2000 in North America shows that the stigma level was significantly higher in younger age groups [44]. Liu’s [15] study in rural China found that age did not play a role in the level of AIDS stigma. Differences in sampling strategy and ways of measuring stigma may have contributed to these conflicting findings. One possible explanation for our result is that PLWHA in this age group are often the main household breadwinner. It is possible through their employment outside the home that they are exposed to greater discrimination. In addition, as PLWHA become too ill to work as they get older, the presence of the disease may become more visible to others. An alternative explanation is due to cohort differences. PLWHA who are currently 50-59 years of age represent many of the first group of people infected with HIV in the mid-1990s (especially in central China). At that time, there was no public education on AIDS in China. Therefore, those who were infected during the middle 1990s were exposed to high levels of AIDS stigma and discrimination. Recently, however, there has been a decline in social stigma faced by PLWHA. Over the past decade, Chinese federal and provincial governments conducted public education campaigns to increase knowledge about HIV/AIDS and to decrease stigma [1]. Many respondents in our study in Henan and Anhui provinces mentioned that this government initiated campaign was extremely helpful in improving the social acceptance of PLWHA. In addition, the programs to provide financial assistance to PLWHA and free HAART indicate government’s support for PLWHA. These programs have eased the economic impact of the disease and made ill PLWHA less dependent on family, friends and neighbors. Other studies of rural Chinese PLWHA are needed to determine if the same age pattern in perceived impact of social relationships can be replicated and to investigate other possible mechanisms which might explain this perplexing finding.

Free provision of HAART and other drugs is an important policy for which the Chinese government should be commended. However, our finding that those with full-blown AIDS symptoms were more likely to report that illness negatively affected their social relationships underlines the need for better medication to slow the progress of the disease.

Although there are policies in China addressing the needs of those with HIV/AIDS, further outreach and public education is needed. Intervention research must investigate the impact of financial subsidies, rural home-health care programs, support groups and public education on the social relationships of Chinese PLWHA. Representative rural and urban samples of Chinese PLWHA will improve the generalizability of future studies. Such studies are necessary because of substantial economic disparities and cultural differences between urban and rural Chinese regions.

There are several limitations to this study. The sensitivity of AIDS as a topic of investigation and the challenge of locating a large sample of PLWHA to complete the study resulted in our use of non- random sampling. Due to our sampling strategy, the vast majority of respondents (over 70%), received government financial assistance for PLWHA. Furthermore, our sample was predominantly drawn from villages with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS where the transmission mode was primarily through blood and plasma donations. It is possible that the social issues faced by PLWHA are more severe in villages with few PLWHA or with other modes of transmission. Thus, we cannot be confident that our findings are representative of the experience of rural Chinese PLWHA. Another major limitation is that the impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships was measured by self-report. Although the subjective perception of the PLWHA of the impact of HIV/AIDS on their social relationships has some advantages, objective measurement of social support in longitudinal studies would provide a better measure of the impact of HIV/AIDS on the provision and availability of social support. We also do not have information about the transmission mode of the disease. Research indicated this is an important factor in stigma [45,46]. Other important factors to consider in future research would be ethnic minority status and history of internal migration by the PLWHA and their sexual partners.

Despite these limitations, this study provided the largest survey to date of rural Chinese PLWHA perception of the social impact of HIV/AIDS on their social relationships with friends, extended families and neighbors. The findings suggest the need for government policy and program attention to the issue of poverty and social marginalization among PLWHA.

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The study was funded by the Health Policy and Systems Research, an initiative of the Global Forum for Health Research in Collaboration with the World Health Organization. This publication is an output of the POVILL Project, supported by the Sixth Framework Programme of the European Commission.

We would like to thank Marion Hurd for her assistance in preparing this manuscript.